brand-new Trump policy could strengthen role of nuclear weapons

President Donald Trump’s administration could pursue development of brand-new nuclear weaponry in addition to explicitly leave open the possibility of nuclear retaliation for major non-nuclear attacks, if a leaked draft policy document becomes reality.

The Pentagon did not comment on the document, which was published by the Huffington Post website in addition to prompted sharp criticism via arms control experts, who voiced concerns the idea could raise the risks of nuclear war.

The Defense Department said on Friday the idea did not discuss “pre-decision, draft copies of strategies in addition to reviews.”

“The Nuclear Posture Review has not been completed in addition to will ultimately be reviewed in addition to approved by the President in addition to the Secretary of Defense,” the Pentagon said in a statement.

One source familiar with the document told Reuters the draft was authentic, nevertheless did not say whether the idea was the same type which will be presented to Trump for approval.

The Republican Trump’s predecessor, Democrat Barack Obama, declared his intent to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in his Nuclear Posture Review in 2010, the last time the policy document was crafted.

The Trump administration’s draft document, said, however, which Obama-era assumptions of a world where nuclear weapons were less relevant proved incorrect.

“the globe can be more dangerous, not less,” the idea said.

the idea more readily embraces the role of nuclear weapons as a deterrent to adversaries, in addition to, as expected, backs a costly modernization of the aging U.S. nuclear arsenal.

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated which modernizing in addition to maintaining the U.S. nuclear arsenal over the next 30 years will cost more than $1.2 trillion.

The document sought to put those costs in perspective, noting which maintenance of the existing stockpile could account for nearly half the projected costs. An effective nuclear deterrent was also less expensive than war, the idea said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


2 × one =