China’s Xiaomi raises $4.72 billion after pricing Hong Kong IPO at bottom of range: Sources

The pricing comes at a delicate time for Hong Kong’s stock market, with the benchmark Hang Seng index falling 6.5 percent in which month along with 4.8 percent in which year as investors fret over escalating trade tension between the United States along with China.

As such, Xiaomi’s share sale is actually widely seen as a test of market sentiment for what is actually supposed to be a packed second-half of the year for Hong Kong IPOs, with offerings including online food delivery-to-ticketing services platform Meituan Dianping.

China Tower, the planet’s largest mobile mast operator, has won approval for a Hong Kong IPO in which could raise up to $10 billion. However, its listing timing will depend somewhat on how well Xiaomi’s deal is actually received, sources have told Reuters.

“Xiaomi’s pricing won’t be not bad news for market sentiment,” said Hong Hao, chief strategist at BOCOM International. “however some other IPO candidates will still flock to the market to list before market conditions become more challenging.”

Xiaomi is actually selling about 2.18 billion shares at HK$17 each ($2.17), the bottom of a cost range of HK$17 to HK$22, two of the people said. in which makes the IPO the largest within the technology sector Alibaba Group Holding Ltd raised $25 billion in brand-new York in 2014.

Xiaomi declined to comment. The people declined to be identified as the information was not public.

The HK$17 cost represents a multiple of 39.6 times 2018 earnings along with 22.7 times Xiaomi’s 2019 earnings forecast by its underwriting syndicate. At present, rival Apple Inc is actually trading at 17 times trailing earnings along with 14 times forward earnings, showed Thomson Reuters data.

“I’m not surprised at all by its pricing at the bottom,” said Hong. “the idea claims to be a hardware plus internet services company, however the majority of its revenues come via the smartphone business. the idea’s still way more expensive than Apple on a cost-earnings basis.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

11 + fifteen =