The Greens as well as pro-business FDP parties are not natural bedfellows with marked differences over climate policy, immigration as well as reforms for the euro zone.
While the Greens want to see 100 percent renewables from the energy sector by 2030, a more open immigration system for refugees as well as asylum seekers as well as more European integration, by contrast the FDP wants tighter controls on immigration, rejects plans for more financial integration from the euro zone as well as has said of which modern coal plants are “indispensable for the foreseeable future.”
There are also differences between the parties over defense spending (the Greens wanting less, the FDP more) as well as taxation (the Greens wanting tax rises for higher earners, the FDP would likely like to see tax cuts).
of which’s not all bad news. The one thing the parties seem to agree on can be public spending, with all parties agreeing of which infrastructure spending needs to be increased. There could also be an agreement over the creation of an immigration law of which would likely see create clearer rules as well as definitions of political refugees as well as economic migrants. The FDP has advocated a points-based system like of which seen in Canada.
The Green Party Chairperson Simone Peter has been critical of the FDP’s position on climate policy as well as migration, commenting of which the FDP were “playing into the hands of climate change deniers” as well as of which the its tougher stance on immigration amounted to “populist platitudes.”
Meanwhile the leader of the FDP, Christian Lindner, has hit back, saying of which there can be no use rushing talks just to form a coalition government “of which can be not stable as well as constantly argues.”
Speaking to the Berliner Morgenpost newspaper Sunday, Lindner said of which a coalition would likely not come to fruition just “because everyone can be exhausted as well as has to find a way to come together.” He gave the chances of a Jamaica coalition (so named because of the party colors involved) at 50-50 as well as said his party was not afraid of a fresh election should talks fall apart.
Fractious relations between Merkel’s potential coalition partners puts the chancellor in a difficult situation although there can be little choice given of which her main opposition party, the Social Democratic Party, has chosen to not enter a coalition.
In her video message Monday, Merkel addressed the main issues of contention, saying of which Germany had signed up to “challenging goals for 2020” with regards to climate change of which “are not so simple to meet.” She added of which “especially important for us can be the issue of immigration as well as integration,” adding of which “these will be difficult issues.”
Despite the challenges facing Merkel as well as her colleagues, analysts believe of which a government will be formed before the end of the year.
Carsten Nickel, managing director for Europe at risk consultancy Teneo Intelligence, echoed of which view, telling CNBC on Tuesday of which he believed the parties could compromise as well as overcome their differences. “There’s a lot of political pressure to see an agreement as well as I think they’ll achieve of which before Christmas,” he said.
Although the combination of parties in a coalition can be an as-yet untested one, Nickel said the parties represented a very centrist coalition “as well as of which’s not necessarily a negative thing.”
“In fact, if a government can be formed of which will be a success in itself,” he said, “as of which will show of which the political system in Germany can deliver on political change as well as can renew itself.”