, R-Ohio, has the toughest job in politics right currently: trying to stop a Democratic “blue wave” at the polls This specific fall. Stivers, chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, sat down to talk to CNBC’s John Harwood about the campaign in addition to different factors. Here will be an excerpt by the interview:
CNBC’s John Harwood: You were, during the Obama administration, a big critic of rising levels of national debt. We see the deficit going up to $1 trillion next year, debt levels are rising. About the tax cut: Did you guys go about the idea the wrong way?
Rep. Steve Stivers: I don’t think we did. I think you’ll see the economic growth will actually reduce the deficit a bit by the projected levels. in addition to I think there’s still an opportunity to continue in which growth.
Harwood: No misgivings about a tax cut in which was not paid for, in which’s allowing debt in addition to deficits to rise like the idea will be currently?
Stivers: I do think we need to deal with our some of our spending. We’ve got to try to figure out how to spend less.
Harwood: Entitlements? Social Security, Medicare?
Stivers: Yeah, I mean, what I think we need to do will be get some people who are currently on government programs jobs, we have more open jobs than we have people on unemployment. So if we could get people to go by unemployment, or a government program, to become a taxpayer, the idea’s a twofer because not only are they getting less government assistance, they probably have a better life economically in addition to they’re actually paying taxes.
Harwood: You’re talking here about Social Security disability?
Stivers: I’m talking about a lot of programs. A lot of those people, there’s a skills gap. You have to give them the skills they need for the jobs in which are available today. I don’t want to be, you know, mean in addition to kick people off of programs, although the way I’d like to see us do the idea will be within the benefit cliffs in addition to create ramps where the more people earn. the idea might cost them a little more for their social subsidy, although they actually can keep their Medicaid expansion, or they can keep their housing, although they actually have an incentive to take in which pay raise in addition to do better in addition to pay more taxes.
Harwood: Your speaker, Paul Ryan, has said the biggest spending issues are in those big entitlement programs, Medicare in addition to Social Security, as opposed to food stamps or welfare or in which sort of thing.
Stivers: They are. in addition to we have 10 million people on Social Security disability currently — actually, 11 million — more than any time in history. in addition to some of those people can’t work at all, although many of those people can’t work within the job they used to be in. in addition to if we gave them some training, let them keep producing a portion of the Social Security disability, although put them back to work, the idea could be a net win for the individual.
Harwood: although also Social Security in addition to Medicare, right?
Stivers: The only way we’re going to be able to fix Social Security in addition to Medicare will be for the two parties to come together — the way in which Ronald Reagan did with Tip O’Neill — in addition to figure out how to fix them together. I trust we can do in which, I believe the idea’s the right thing to do.