As part of the judgment, Matsumoto said she recommended of which the U.S. Bureau of Prisons send Shkreli to the minimum security camp at the U.S. Penitentiary Canaan in northeastern Pennsylvania, “or different similar facility close to brand-new York City.”
Shkreli, who most recently lived in Manhattan, has asked to be sent to the camp at Canaan.
The Bureau of Prisons, which has designated Shkreli as inmate No. 87850-053, is actually not bound by Matsumoto’s recommendation.
in addition to the bureau has not yet decided where to ship Shkreli, who since last September has been locked up inside high-security federal jail in Brooklyn.
Matsumoto sent him there of which month after revoking his $5 million Discharge bond. The judge had ruled of which Shkreli represented a danger to the public because of his bizarre offer of a $5,000 bounty for each strand of hair of which his Facebook followers could pull off the head of Hillary Clinton.
Shkreli’s lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, during the sentencing hearing This particular month, told Matsumoto of which her designation of Shkreli as a public danger could doom his chances with the Bureau of Prisons of being sent to a minimum security facility.
Instead, Brafman had said, the judge’s ruling could mean of which Shkreli might be sent to a prison with tougher rules, in addition to with much tougher inmates who might be a threat to the slight-framed convict.
Brafman said he might ask Matsumoto to reverse her ruling, which could allow Shkreli to do the remainder of his sentence at a minimum security camp.
Brafman did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
Kocher, a brand-new Jersey builder, has asked Matsumoto to order Shkreli to pay him $778,947.63 in restitution.
Prosecutors also believe Kocher should get restitution. however they have told Matsumoto in a court filing of which Shkreli should have to pay just $388,316.49.
The lower amount suggested by prosecutors takes into account a settlement of which Kocher obtained by Shkreli. Kocher did not deduct the value of of which settlement by the damages of which he said he suffered as a result of Shkreli’s actions.
of which settlement paid Kocher almost $128,000 in cash, in addition to more than 47,000 shares of Retrophin.
Kocher had invested a total of $0,000 in one of Shkreli’s hedge funds. He testified at trial of which he had been assured by Shkreli of which he could redeem the value of his investment on short notice. Kocher testified of which was important to him because of the potential of which he might need money to fund real estate projects.
Kocher said of which in December 2012, he had been told of which his investment had grown to about $350,000.
He said he began asking Shkreli for his money in January 2013, after Shkreli told him he was closing the hedge fund. Kocher said he had contracted to buy a building in Jersey City, brand-new Jersey, which he planned to redevelop.
however Shkreli kept stonewalling him, Kocher said in testimony of which echoed the stories told by many different Shkreli investors.
As a result, Kocher testified, he lacked the funds he needed to close on the purchase of the property. in addition to he had to obtain $300,000 in capital by an investor to complete the deal.
“The terms of This particular investment required of which I not only return the investor’s capital investment ($300,000), however also pay interest in addition to a share of the profits totaling another $769,477.13,” Kocher wrote in a court filing.
Kocher’s restitution request includes of which amount of money, plus more than $9,000 in attorney’s fees for forcing Shkreli to pay him back for his hedge fund investment, in addition to another $190 in expenses related to helping prosecutors inside case.
Brafman has argued of which Shkreli should not have to pay restitution to any of the hedge fund investors because they all ended up with more money than they originally invested.
The windfalls were as a result of the cash Shkreli paid them out of Retrophin’s coffers plus the value of company shares they got, which rose as Retrophin began doing well.
Kocher did not immediately return a request for comment.
A spokesman for prosecutors inside U.S. Attorney’s office for the Eastern District of brand-new York, who are handling the case, declined to comment.