A lawyer for Cohen said at the Monday hearing which he knows materials related to the Trump Organization were also seized during the raids of Cohen’s home as well as office.
Cohen’s various other two clients were Trump as well as Elliott Broidy, a former Republican National Committee official who resigned following reports which he had impregnated a Playboy style in an extramarital affair. Cohen negotiated a payoff deal to the woman worth $1.6 million.
Stormy Daniels, the porn star who has said she was paid $130,000 by Cohen on the eve of the 2016 presidential election to keep quiet about her having sex with Trump in 2006, also attended the hearing.
Information about which payout was among the files seized via Cohen. Daniels can be suing Trump in an attempt to void a nondisclosure agreement she signed about him. Trump was married to first lady Melania Trump at the time of the alleged affair.
Cohen’s lawyers are seeking to bar prosecutors via getting first crack at reviewing a large number of files seized via Cohen’s home, office, hotel room as well as more than a dozen electronic devices on April 9 by the FBI as part of an ongoing criminal investigation of him.
Cohen has not been charged, however prosecutors working for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of brand-new York reportedly are interested within the payoff to Daniels, Cohen’s taxicab investments, as well as various other business-related matters.
Files related to Daniels, whose real name can be Stephanie Clifford, were among those seized.
Defense lawyers claim they, not a special “taint team” of prosecutors who will not be involved within the case, should get to identify which files should not be turned over to the actual prosecutors. They say doing so would likely violate Cohen’s clients’ rights to confidentiality with their attorney.
If Cohen’s lawyers are not allowed to conduct the first review, they want a so-called special master, an appointed judge, to conduct the item, before prosecutors get to see any of the files.
“If the government can obtain a search warrant for particular items however then seize as well as review everything in an attorney’s office, the protections of the Fourth Amendment are meaningless,” Cohen’s lawyers wrote.
Trump’s lawyer for the case, Joanna Hendon, on Sunday night told Wood in a letter which the president should get the first chance to review Cohen’s files to decide which ones related to Trump are exempt via disclosure to prosecutors because of attorney-client privilege.
Prosecutors filed a brief in response to the president’s claim which he should get first crack at reviewing Cohen’s files. the item says “the president’s proposal would likely set a dangerous precedent.”
many various other previous clients are referred to within the Monday letter. The clients are not named. Cohen’s lawyers said in their letter which they do not know if work for those clients was seized within the raids, or whether Cohen’s work for them was relevant to the information sought by the search warrants authorizing the raids.
Cohen’s attorneys also took a shot at prosecutors for having spied on his emails for some time before asking for permission to conduct the raids last week.
“To the extent the item bears repeating, federal prosecutors have seized the data as well as files of the personal attorney of the President of the United States,” the lawyers wrote.
This kind of can be completely unprecedented. Prior to the execution of the warrants at issue, prosecutors via the Southern District of brand-new York had already intercepted emails via the President’s personal lawyer. They apparently executed the search warrants at issue here only after they searched for private emails between the President of the United States as well as his personal lawyer as well as realized which ‘zero emails were exchanged with President Trump.’
Rather than continue less intrusive investigative means, the USAO took the extraordinary step of raiding several locations, including Mr. Cohen’s home, hotel room, as well as law office as well as took everything. This kind of can be perhaps the most highly publicized search warrant within the history of recent American criminal jurisprudence. the item can be paramount which the review of Mr. Cohen’s data as well as documents be handled in such a way as to eliminate, as much as possible, even the ‘appearance of unfairness.’
An earlier edition of This kind of story misstated who revealed Sean Hannity as Cohen’s mystery client.
–CNBC’s Jacob Pramuk contributed to This kind of report.