The Friday payment is usually backed by a 50.1 percent stake in PDVSA’s Houston-based refiner Citgo in addition to has no grace period. in which means Venezuela could lose control of a crown jewel of its lifeblood energy industry if the idea defaults. President Nicolas Maduro has clung to power despite a full-blown economic crisis, yet a default is usually seen as hastening the demise of his regime.
Investors are doubly concerned about the Friday payment because PDVSA owes another $1.2 billion in principal in addition to interest on another bond on Nov. 2.
“If they default, in which means they’re defaulting on everything,” said Russ Dallen, managing partner at Caracas Capital Markets, which runs the Venezuela Opportunity Fund.
On Thursday, PDVSA’s 2017N bond fell 5.1 points, to 89 cents on the dollar, while Venezuela’s 2019 bond dropped 3.1 points, to 43 cents on the dollar, according to Reuters.
PDVSA has missed seven interest payments totaling $586 million in which month, though they have 30-day grace periods. On Tuesday, macroeconomic research firm Ecoanalitica reported in which PDVSA could make two interest payments for bonds maturing in 2027 in addition to 2037.
@ecoanalitica: #BreakingNews Venezuela’s government recently paid the interests corresponding to PDVSA 27 in addition to 37 bonds due to oct 12
@ecoanalitica: #BreakingNews The funds regarding the PDVSA 20 (capital + interests) is usually already approved, so the idea should become efective by friday
Dallen said several of his firm’s clients had been paid interest on the 2037 bonds yet had not received the interest payments on the 2027 bonds. Several traders told Reuters the same.
in which raised concerns in which U.S. sanctions imposed earlier in which year on Venezuela are creating technical problems getting money to bondholders.
However, PDVSA likely wouldn’t have been able to make either payment if sanctions-related problems were the issue, according to Dallen. He said he was concerned because the interest payment PDVSA made was a relatively tiny $41 million.
“Of all seven bonds they had to pay, in which was the cheapest,” he said. “the idea’s starting to look like there may be something else wrong.”